Hi Experts,
While i am posting entry through f-90 i am getting below error.
Message no. AA651
The multi-level method of phase N1 in depreciation key IN8 has not been correctly maintained for acquisition year 1950.
Correct the multi-level method of depreciation key IN8.
Please help me to solve this problem
Regards,
Ramana
I have defined a coding mask in Investment Management, but no matter what I enter I receive error that the "Length of Entry is not correct".
1. I set up the mask as shown below
Key ("EdID") = Z
Coding Editing Mask = "/XXX-0000"
2. I execute Transaction IM24 (Create Investment Program" as shown below. I'm trying to create a Top Position "DMF-0001" as shown
3. I get the error message shown below.
Does anyone have any thoughts as to where I may be going wrong. As far as I can tell it's failing what should be a simple validation.
Thanks in advance.
Hello Team,
I was searching for one issue in Assets Accounting Depritiation and I was trying to check the T.code OAGL (Reset Depritiation)
Wwhile putting the company code into T.code it ask for my opinion (Yes/No/Cancel) as I gone throught with the consequences for clicking yes I was trying to click on NO option but mistakenly I clicked on "Yes" and due to this I guess the data related to Assets Accounting has been messed up.
Is there anyone who can help me out on this issue please, as we are in our test system Quality and our UAT is going to be started.
Even I am not sure why the company code has not the status of "Productive" by my client otherwise this issue was not created.
kindly help.
Regards,
Hello,
During a financial roll-out for Latvia, we are faced with an issue regarding the tax depreciation.
The business/legal requirements are as follows: for tax purpose, an asset benefits from a decline balance depreciation at a constant rate, 70% for instance, until the net tax value reaches below 71 euros, in case of which, the asset should be fully depreciated by the end of current year.
Example:
An asset purchased at 1000 by year end 2014
| Date | Depreicaiton | Net book value |
|---|---|---|
| 31/12/2014 | 1000 | |
| 31/12/2015 | 700 | 300 |
| 31/12/2016 | 210 | 90 |
| 31/12/2017 | 90 | 0 |
Depreciation for year N+2 is 90 €(full depreciation) because the decline method would have led to a net value of 27€, which is below 71 euros.
There are 2 problems:
- The setting in OAYJ does trigger a changeover method when the asset goes below 71 euros, however, by standard logic, the full depreciation takes place always for the following year not the current year. For the above example, the asset value goes to 0 by year end 2018 not 2017.
- The business has no idea what the tax useful life to be maintained in asset master because it is calculated by the tax depreciation. However, the standard SAP does not seem to support a dummy tax useful life.
Can anyone help ?
Thanks !
HI Experts,
My client had a requirement of Assets to be split into sub assets with their balances & depreciation.
For that we are going to create sub assets & will transfer balance using ABUMN.
Client is ready with Excel sheet of new sub assets which have their last date (Date till which to be depreciated) - what will be best approach for last date of sub assets (or for remaining life)?
I have one solution for it is to update its expired useful life ( Ex. UL = Useful life – remaining life )
But not sure whether it is correct or not. & Expired UL field is not available for sub assets, kindly let me know which check box to be selected in AO21 for that.
Hi All,
Need your inputs as am new to assets. I am uploading assets from legacy system into SAP. I have the list of assets where some assets are very old. When i try to upload this using AS91 the system gives an error "Exter rate xxx/xxx type M in the system settings". I have checked OB08 and looks the rates are not maintained. Since these assets are very old do I need to maintain old rates in order to upload these old assets? This seems unrealistic as each of the asset has different capitalization date and are very old.
what would be the normal or the best practice to upload such old assets.
thank you
Viru
Hello Gurus,
I'm facing an error AA660 during posting of unplanned amortization for an asset saying that transaction value in area 31 (local area) contradicts NBV rule. I found references to this error in a lot of SCN threads, but each time the answer boiled down to changes in the settings for particular area in OADB (suggestion being to put "All values allowed" for NBV rule).
Technical side of the issue is ok, but the trouble is why should the asset NBV be negative after posting of unplanned depreciation at all? Asset value in 31 area at the end of the June (by the way, it's also end of fiscal year) equals to appr. 1.500.000,00 RUB, unplanned amortization equals appr. 180.000,00 RUB. So how can the NBV be negative? Could you please advise me what is the logic for calculation of NBV in such cases and how to get rid of the message without modifying NBV rule?
Thank you!
P.S. Some details:
- asset is purchased on 15.06.2015;
- start of depreciation in area 01 - 01.06.2015;
- start of depreciation in area 31 - 01.07.2015.
- unplanned amortization posting date - 30.06.2015;
- depreciation methods - all linear.
Hi All,
I am facing an issue during Transfer.
My client is on 5-4-4 calendar, 08/28/2015 is the last day of Fiscal Year 2015. If I post Asset Transfer on 08/28/2015 or 08/27/2015 ( Asset Value Date) . System is reversing depreciation for the whole year, but if I use any other date it is working fine.
I have checked the configuration in AFAMP, period control is 02 for transfers.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Vivek
Hi All,
Our company would like to start asset revaluation for the first time using SAP since 2005.
We want to ask, what kind of configuration for asset revaluation in book revaluation area and tax revaluation area.
So far we have done configuration as below:
1. OABW - RevlAPC Ticked and RevlD Ticked
2. AO90 - Revaluation Account Assignment
3. OAYR - Post revaluation Ticked
4. OAXJ - Change Transaction Type 820 and insert depreciation area (book and tax) into Transaction Type
Then, we try to revaluate asset in AR29N and got this error message:
In case of error using AR29N for asset revaluation. We try to use ABAW, it's success make a change in Revaluation APC
Anyone please help us, may we miss the configuration should we done?
Thanks 
Hi All
I am facing the issue with remaining useful days in AW01N when i created the the new dep key as per new companies act which is based on useful life of asset.
System is calculating one day less dep on the asset. Suppose if i acquired an asset on 1.04.2014 and my useful life is 1 year 9 months it is taking no of days as 274 instead of 275 in 2014.
When i change the year from 2014 to 2015 it is taking 1st year as 275 and for 2015 it is taking as 364 instead of 365.
Your quick response will highly appreciable on this. we have already implemented OSS note 2052506.
Thanks & Regards
Abu Siddiq
We are in ECC6 EHP 6
As per SAP Income Tax Depreciation document for India we have to activate country specific data. We have to activate for country india-table GL0_S_IN_DEPCALTI-India Time Dependent Data- When I include in for india the above table i.e., GL0_S_IN_DEPCALTI it is not accepting. It is giving an error message.
Also to add group box s0400-table layout india-I am able to add table layout in asset class.
When I create asset master I am able to get india specific data tab but without any fields.
As per SAP in this table we have to get Block Key, Additional Block Key and Put to use date.
How to activate the above fields in EHP 6
Joseph David
Hi Everyone,
Recently our company decided to use asset under construction settlement with the help of transaction AIAB. Previously the line settlement option wasn't enabled in asset classes, but we changed configuration and starting from 2015 it is.
Now everything works for AuC created in current financial year, but we have one AuC created in 2007 and not capitalized yet. For this asset in AIAB system returns error "This transaction can only be carried out for assets with active line item management."
I assume this is normal system behavior since the values on this AuC were posted in closed FY, but management wants more "technical" explanation of such a behavior and I can't explain them why it is so.
Maybe someone could share some thoughts about it
Thanks
Hi everyone,
I have created an asset master data and I have posted its acquisition in period jan/2015 (ANLA-AKTIV = jan/2015). I have performed the program J_1AA011 (asset revaluation for inflation), but appeared the following message: " XXXXXXXXX-X No revaluation posted for period 001/2015". If I run it in february/2015, the posting is filled correctly. This occured even if I fill in the AFAMP the option "acquisition control period", like "01"( pro rata at period start date).
Is it not possible to post inflation revaluation in the same period of acquisition of an fixed asset ? Should I use any user exit for this issue?
Thanks for all.
Marcus Vinicius
Hi,
When i am loading legacy assets in AS91, Ordinary Depreciation Start date is automatically populating in that field without giving manually.
But when i tried to create asset in AS01, Ordinary Depreciation start date is not coming automatically...What is the problem? How in AS01 - Ordinary Depreciation start date will come automatically?
Please help me
Sap Guru
We have asset class zj17, this issue contains those assets which have MANU depreciation key, and this depreciation key does not charge any depreciation.
These assets till date have been charged depreciation as unplanned depreciation on monthly basis. Now the client wants to change depreciation key as of 01/08/2015 (which is in the middle of the year)
The depreciation key which they want to use is INWB which is on life Basis as per the company’s act 2013.
Here is an example.
Asset No# |
|
Asset Description | MAIN UNIT,DRYPIX 7000 200V 2T ED2 E |
Qty | 3 |
Total Value | 587,576 |
Capitalized Date | 21-Dec-12 |
Dep Date | 31-Mar-15 |
Scrap Value 5% | 29,378.79 |
UseFul life | 25-Oct-17 |
Unplanned Depreciation Calculation on MANU Key | |||
Date | Days | Unplanned Depreciation Amount | Remaining Book Value |
21-Dec-12 |
| - | 587,576 |
31-Mar-13 |
| 72,557 | 515,019 |
31-Mar-14 |
| 232,129 | 282,890 |
31-Mar-15 |
| 127,504 | 155,386 |
31-Jul-15 |
| 23,345 | 132,041 |
`
Q- How to change dep. key from MANU to INWB in the asset. “In the middle of the year”?
Q – If I create new asset by transferring the value to new asset in different asset class thru ABUMN, what all I have to consider for creating new asset.
* I have created asset with remaining values of asset but it is giving error on depreciation as it depreciating the asset within 5 months instead of putting life of remaining 2 year and 4 month.
Please guide
Dear all,
I encountered an issue when I transfer asset within company code (ABUMN). The purpose is to report asset held for sales in BPC.
Have any standard solution for it?
For my solution, I want to post 'accumulated depreciation' to new transcation type and new transaction type connect group transaction type 260.
How can I post 'accu,ulated depreciation' to new transaction type? Where should I configuration?
The configuration is simulate Asset Transaction Document.
Thank you.
Regards
Hi Experts,
Scenario:
We plan to implement parallel ledger.
0L for US GAAP, Z1 for local GAAP
In Asset Accounting, we create following depreciation ara,
01 ---- US depreciation assigned to ledger 0L
30 --- Local depreciation assigned to ledger Z1
50 --- difference 01-30, assigned to ledger Z1.
It is OK to fulfill finance requirement for US GAAP and Local GAAP.
According to SAP help, only depreciation area 01 is transfer to CO.
So that means only the US GAAP value is shown in CO. That means Local GAAP depreciation will not show in CO.
My Question:
1. If product costing calculation have to use Local GAAP depreciation, How to realize it?
2. Why can we transfer all depreciation area's data to CO?
3. What is the priciple for designing the relation of depreciation ad ledger?
thanks
Hi,
I have found one issue while testing Asset Accounting.
I have transferred one asset (90001) through T-Code: ABUMN to (90002). Now while posting retirement of Assets through T-Code: F-92, i found that system is showing both Asset Numbers (Active Asset and Deactivated Asset) while pressing F4 (Personal Value List) on Assets Field. This may cause confusion to end user as to which asset he should select for retirement.
If he selects wrong one, then he will face error that the said asset (90001) is deactivated.
My question is if this asset is deactivated then why system is showing this one while checking available assets list? List should not show deactivated assets while posting any asset transactions.
One workaround is that we should change the name of deactivated assets but this is just workaround and i am looking for any solution which enables system to not show deactivated assets on available assets lists at all as it creates confusion and unnecessary list of values.
How can i achieve this, please guide?
Hi All,
As per my organization's current scenario we are purchasing the assets instead of client (like laptops & Iphone) related to the client and billed them at the time of client billing.
So any body can tell me how to maintain this in SAP System, is there any entry which has to be made at the time of creation of asset master record, and what are the entries while performing creation of purchase order, MIGO & MIRO.
Regards
Ankur
Hi All,
Had a question, should we consider the assets which were disposed/sold as part of legacy Assets data migration?
or should we upload them together with the other old assets and retire them manually. Appreciate your inputs on the transactions involved and the accounting entries.
thank you
regards
Viru